Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective trial assesses ABVD effectiveness in advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting it remains a viable treatment option.
Objectives: Novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin and anti-PD-1 antibodies, together with PET-adapted intensified strategies, have improved outcomes in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, their applicability remains limited in many middle-income countries because of restricted drug availability, reimbursement barriers, and toxicity concerns. Therefore, real-world data on the effectiveness of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) remains essential. Methods: We conducted a retrospective two-center study including 95 patients with newly diagnosed cHL treated with first-line ABVD. Baseline characteristics, treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and mortality were compared between early-stage (I–II, n = 33) and advanced-stage (III–IV, n = 62) disease. Results: The median age was 38 years (range, 18–73), and 69.5% were male; 65% had advanced-stage. Complete response rates were high in both early-stage (97%) and advanced-stage (95.2%) patients. Median PFS (21 vs. 23 months; p = 0.994) and OS (23 vs. 25 months; p = 0.848) were similar. Five-year OS was 84.3% for early-stage and 98% for advanced-stage patients (p = 0.292), while five-year PFS was 55.3% and 29.6% (p = 0.526). Mortality rates were comparable. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, first-line ABVD achieved high response rates and favorable long-term survival in advanced-stage cHL, supporting its continued use as a frontline treatment option, particularly in settings where access to novel therapies may be limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demirtaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: