Systematic review shows AI methods enhance monitoring of transitional water ecosystems, suggesting improved management strategies.
Transitional water ecosystems exhibit pronounced spatio-temporal variability and increasing anthropogenic pressures, posing substantial challenges for ecological monitoring and management. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), has emerged as a powerful framework for addressing the structural complexity of these systems. This systematic review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies applying ML and DL to ecological research and monitoring in transitional waters. A structured search of the Scopus® database was conducted up to 31 December 2024, and studies were screened according to predefined eligibility criteria and PRISMA 2020 guidance; methodological quality was appraised using a structured assessment framework. Ninety-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Regression was the most frequent analytical task (44.1%), followed by classification (36.2%) and clustering (19.7%), with water quality monitoring representing the dominant thematic domain. Tree-based and kernel-based ML models prevailed overall, whereas DL architectures increased markedly after 2020, particularly in remote sensing and high-dimensional applications. Despite methodological heterogeneity and variable validation practices, the evidence indicates that ML and DL approaches effectively accommodate non-linearity, data heterogeneity, and scale mismatches typical of transitional waters. Standardized validation strategies and improved model interpretability remain essential for robust ecological inference and operational implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cazzetta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: