PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Nonlinear Theory and Its Applications IEICE0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of APCMA and CSMA/CA in Wireless Brain-Inspired Computing

RNRyuji NagazawaHOHaruto OtaKSKosuke Sanada

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different wireless communication protocols on spiking neural network performance in IoT devices.
  • Experimentally tested Asynchronous Pulse Code Multiple Access (APCMA) against Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA)
  • Analyzed delay jitter and packet loss during spike signal transmission
  • Measured learning success rates during XOR learning under varying communication densities.
  • CSMA/CA introduced significant delay jitter and packet loss, impacting performance
  • APCMA consistently maintained low delay and zero packet loss
  • Learning success rate for CSMA/CA decreased with higher communication density, while APCMA sustained high success rates.

Abstract

Wireless Brain-Inspired Computing (WiBIC), which implements spiking neural networks (SNNs) in a distributed manner on IoT devices, is gaining attention as a technology enabling serverless, autonomous learning. Since SNN learning relies on precise spike timing information, selecting the wireless communication protocol for transmitting spike signals is critically important. However, protocols like Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), widely used in IoT, introduce probabilistic delays to avoid collisions, potentially degrading SNN learning performance. This research proposes Asynchronous Pulse Code Multiple Access (APCMA) as a communication method suitable for spike transmission in WiBIC. In actual device experiments, CSMA/CA caused significant delay jitter and packet loss due to communication contention, whereas APCMA maintained nearly constant delay with no observed loss. For XOR learning, the learning success rate using CSMA/CA decreased as communication density increased, while APCMA maintained stable high success rate regardless of communication density.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nagazawa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ede5a333a821460d7fdhttps://doi.org/10.1587/nolta.17.583
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mutual Information Analysis of Neuromorphic Coding for Distributed Wireless Spiking Neural Networks2024
  2. 2A CDMA Based Approach for QoS Improvement in Intra-Aircraft Wireless Sensor Networks (IAWSN)2024
  3. 3A Novel Energy Efficient <scp>MAC</scp> Protocol Based <scp>RF</scp> Energy Harvesting for Scalable <scp>WBANs</scp>2026
  4. 4AI‐Driven Cognitive Routing and Delay‐Aware Packet Scheduling for Next‐Generation Wireless Sensor Networks2026
  5. 5Alleviating the Communication Bottleneck in Neuromorphic Computing with Custom-Designed Spiking Neural Networks2025