Qualitative analysis shows multinational enterprises navigate compliance under EU and Chinese data laws, revealing adaptive strategies.
In an era of proliferating but divergent data protection regimes, the European Union's rights‐based approach and China's sovereignty‐centric model have become two dominant poles of global data governance. This article examines how multinational enterprises navigate compliance under these dual systems and how that compliance is shaped through interaction with regulators and courts. Using a multi‐level qualitative framework, we combine macro analysis of legal regimes, meso assessment of enforcement, and micro case studies of TikTok in the EU and Accor in China. We show that both jurisdictions assert extraterritorial control and intensify enforcement through distinct institutional pathways. Confronted with conflicting obligations, firms segment data architectures and embed compliance in technical design, trading interoperability for legal certainty. These dynamics reveal a recursive relationship between law, enforcement, and organisational adaptation, in which the practical meaning of compliance is produced through rules‐in‐use and firms exercise bounded agency rather than full autonomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yiping Cao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: