Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Researchers analyze new subgradient descent methods for minimizing nonsmooth convex functions, showing improved performance under adversarial conditions.
We consider minimizing nonsmooth convex functions with bounded subgradients. However, instead of directly observing a subgradient at every step, the optimizer receives an adversarially corrupted subgradient. The adversary's power is limited to a finite corruption budget, with which the adversary can strategically time their perturbations. We show that the averaged subgradient descent method, which is optimal in the noiseless case, has worst-case performance that deteriorates quadratically with the corruption budget. Using performance optimization programming, (i) we construct and analyze the performance of three novel subgradient descent methods, and (ii) propose a novel lower bound on the worst-case suboptimality gap of any first-order method satisfying a mild cone condition proposed by [5]. The worst-case performance of each of our methods degrades only linearly with the corruption budget. Furthermore, we prove that all three proposed subgradient descent methods are nearoptimal and suffer a worst-case suboptimality gap which asymptotically matches our lower bound. Our subgradient descent methods achieve near-optimal performance without needing momentum nor averaging. This suggests that these techniques are not necessary in this context, which is in line with recent results by [9].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gösgens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: