PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Medical Physics0 citationsOpen Access

Can Rectal Cancer Patients with Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Avoid Surgery?

View Full Paper
EREmad RezkallahBPBenjamin Perakath

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the feasibility of the Watch and Wait pathway for rectal cancer patients with complete clinical response post-neoadjuvant therapy.
  • Conducted a retrospective review of rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy
  • Evaluated outcomes of the Watch and Wait approach versus traditional surgery
  • Utilized MRI for restaging and assessed its accuracy against excision results
  • Included 41 patients with an average age of 69 years
  • 2-year survival rate was 73% in the surgical group versus 53.3% in the Watch and Wait group
  • Disease-free survival rates were 61.5% for surgery and 46.7% for Watch and Wait
  • MRI sensitivity for detecting residual tumor was 57.69% with 70.73% accuracy, increasing to 80.77% sensitivity and 85.37% accuracy when combined with other tests

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is now the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility of the “Watch and Wait” (WW) pathway for patients who achieved complete clinical response compared with surgery in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing the residual cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer with MRI restaging. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years to assess the efficacy of (WW) pathway. MRI results were compared with either excision results or 3-month follow-up to assess MRI accuracy. Results: We included 41 patients. Average age was 69 ± 10 years. Eleven females and 30 males were included. The 2-year survival and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73% and 61.5% for the surgical group and 53.3% and 46.7% for the (WW) group, respectively. MRI sensitivity for detecting residual tumor was 57.69% with an accuracy rate of 70.73%, while when combining with other tests, the sensitivity increased to 80.77% with an accuracy rate of 85.37%. Conclusion: “Watch and Wait” approach is a safe and acceptable approach guided by regular monitoring and careful selection of the patients. There was no significant difference in 2-year survival and DFS between patients who had surgery and patients who opted for (WW) pathway.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rezkallah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f305a333a821460e1fahttps://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_244_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment2015 · 388 citations
  2. 2Wait-and-See Policy for Clinical Complete Responders After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer2011 · 1,162 citations
  3. 3A Pattern-Based Approach Combining Tumor Morphology on MRI With Distinct Signal Patterns on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Response of Rectal Tumors After Chemoradiotherapy2018 · 87 citations
  4. 4Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer2018 · 659 citations
  5. 5Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting2017 · 1,073 citations