Given the increasing frequency and intensity of floods, which are mostly caused by continuous climate change and growing human pressures on the environment, accurately identifying areas that are susceptible to flooding is a crucial priority for risk reduction and long-term land use planning. Thus, this research examines multilevel flood susceptibility mapping across North Macedonia, using 328 past flood occurrences, 14 conditioning variables derived from a digital elevation model, simplified lithology, and calculated direct runoff. The methodology integrates fuzzy set theory (Fuzzy), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC), and random forest (RF) approaches. The two-stage process employs distinct sets of conditioning factors in sequential flood susceptibility mapping: first, generating Fuzzy/AHP/WLC predictions and pseudo-absence data, and second, producing five RF predictions by varying pseudo-absences and binary cutoffs. Validation results indicate that the very high susceptibility class (0.8–1.0) of the Fuzzy/AHP/WLC model predicted 46.6% of flood pixels within 31.6% of the total area. In comparison, the very high susceptibility class of the RF models predicted 88.5%, 78.3%, 60.6%, 48.5%, and 28.3% of flood pixels within 54.7%, 42.2%, 30.5%, 27.0%, and 25.1% of the total area, respectively. The RF models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.850, with a maximum of 0.966. Additionally, areas of high and low uncertainty were highlighted using a standard deviation map created from the RF models, highlighting agreement/disagreement and potential locations for methodological improvement and focused sampling. The findings also highlight the potential of the multilevel technique for mapping flood susceptibility and call for more research into its potential for future studies and practical uses.
Gorsevski et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: