Demonstrates an integrated framework enhancing fastening quality and reducing downtime in manufacturing, suggesting improved decision-making.
Digital twin (DT) technologies are increasingly applied in manufacturing to support monitoring, optimization, and predictive maintenance; however, most implementations remain operationally focused and disconnected from system-level decision-making and lifecycle engineering. This limitation is particularly critical in manufacturing environments that exhibit System-of-Systems (SoS) characteristics, where performance emerges from the interactions among autonomous, interdependent subsystems. This study proposes an integrated systems engineering framework in which the digital twin functions as a system-level integrator rather than a standalone simulation tool. The framework embeds Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Reliability and Safety analysis (RAMST), and Statistical Process Control (SPC) within a unified digital twin architecture, enabling explicit traceability from stakeholder requirements to design decisions, operational control, and lifecycle performance. The framework is demonstrated through a robotic fastening system operating under high variability, multi-vendor integration, and reliability constraints. A high-fidelity digital twin was developed in MATLAB Simscape and synchronized with operational data via virtual sensors and SPC-based monitoring. Results from a 35-month simulation study (n = 1050 operations) show a 30% reduction in system downtime and a 15% improvement in fastening quality (torque and angle compliance), supported by 95% confidence intervals, alongside enhanced fault detection and preventive maintenance capabilities. The findings demonstrate that integrating decision-making, monitoring, and learning within a single DT environment supports resilient, adaptive manufacturing systems aligned with Industry 4.0–5.0 objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: