Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores forest structure's impact on ecosystem services in Italian Alps, suggesting effective management strategies.
Forest structure is fundamental for linking ecological processes with management outcomes, and it influences key ecosystem services. However, the high cost and complexity of field data collection often limit the application of structural indices to small-scale studies, constraining operational assessments of forest multifunctionality. This study develops and tests an operational indicator of forest multifunctionality based on the structural heterogeneity index derived from forest management plans (FMPs). We analyzed the dendrometric data from 134 management units across 15 FMPs in the Lombardy region (Italy). Horizontal diversity was quantified using a Gini-based index, calculated from tree diameter-class distributions and combined with stand age, timber stock, and tree density using principal component analysis. Two orthogonal gradients emerged: a productivity gradient and a maturity–structural heterogeneity gradient. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess their effects on carbon sequestration, timber yield, and touristic–recreational value. Structural heterogeneity was positively associated with all three functions, while productivity showed contrasting effects, particularly a negative relationship with recreational value. These results demonstrate that structural complexity and productivity are not necessarily in conflict and highlight the potential of FMPs as cost-effective data sources for operational, landscape-scale assessments of forest multifunctionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romanato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: