Analysis of bike-sharing trips in Chicago reveals key factors influencing membership engagement, suggesting strategies for growth.
Bike-sharing offers an eco-friendly and efficient transportation alternative, addressing traffic congestion, environmental concerns, and promoting healthier lifestyles. Understanding the factors that influence bike-sharing trips made by members is essential for the long-term operational and financial sustainability of bike-sharing systems. However, existing studies have primarily relied on survey data and traditional statistical models, which are often constrained by limited sample sizes and an inability to fully capture non-linear relationships or complex interactions between various factors and bike-sharing membership trips. To address these shortcomings, this study leverages million-level trip records from Chicago’s Divvy bike-sharing system and applies explainable machine learning model to identify key determinants influencing bike-sharing trips made by members. Unlike traditional survey-based studies, the proposed framework exploits large-scale operational data to capture complex behavioral patterns and interactions that are not readily observable using standard models. The results indicate a strong positive association between membership-based bike-sharing trips and weekday morning and afternoon commuting periods. Additional factors, such as longer travel distances, proximity to downtown, higher proportions of younger populations, and greater shares of non-White residents, are also positively associated with membership trip activity. These findings both corroborate and extend existing literature, while providing new, data-driven insights enabled by advanced analytical methods. Based on the identified determinants, the study proposes targeted policy and operational strategies to encourage bike-sharing membership adoption. By explicitly overcoming prior methodological limitations, this research offers a robust and scalable analytical framework to support bike-sharing operators in service planning, membership expansion, and the sustainable growth of urban mobility systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: