Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical assay distinguishes HPV+ HNSCC subtypes, indicating improved therapy selection and outcomes.
Purpose: Patients with HPV+ HNSCC have relatively favorable outcomes, standard treatments like radiation or chemoradiation frequently result in long-term toxic side effects. Appropriate patient selection has been a barrier to effectively de-escalate therapy for HPV+ HNSCC and the absence of accurate biomarkers likely contributed to failure of recent promising de-escalation trials that rely on histologic tumor characteristics, history of tobacco use, or tumor response to chemotherapy; This deficiency underlines the need to develop and validate an assay to accurately detect two subtypes of HPV+ HNSCC–one with good prognosis and one with poor prognosis. Experimental Design: These two subtypes are distinguished by the activity of NF-κB in tumors. We first developed a DNA-based marker panel consisting of genes that when mutated would lead to NF-κB activation. Additionally, we developed a custom Nanostring assay to determine the expression of NF-κB target genes. These assays were tested to determine their accuracy in detecting tumor subtype. Results: We demonstrate that the NF-κB gene signature score, as determined using the nanostring assay, could more accurately classify HPV+ HNSCC as compared to the DNA-based marker panel. Patients with a high NF-κB gene signature score demonstrated significantly increased overall survival, indicating more sensitivity to (chemo)radiation treatment. Conclusions: The NF-κB gene signature score can accurately predict response to standard (chemo)radiation in HPV+ HNSCC. This molecular biomarker holds promise for clinical use in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from treatment de-escalation strategies, potentially reducing long-term side effects without compromising therapeutic efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vemulamanda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: