PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Clinical Hypertension2 citationsOpen Access

Elevated Cumulative Blood Pressure is Associated With Cognitive Decline: A Nationwide Population‐Based Cohort Study

View Full Paper
JHJie HuaYLYiling LouYGYi Guo

Key Result

Elevated cumulative systolic blood pressure (β=-0.096 SD/year) and pulse pressure (β=-0.099 SD/year), but not diastolic blood pressure, were associated with accelerated cognitive decline.

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the relationship between cumulative blood pressure levels and cognitive decline.
  • Analyzed data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2018)
  • Standardized cognitive test scores into z-scores
  • Used linear mixed models and restricted cubic splines for analysis
  • Included 7877 participants with a median follow-up of 6.9 years
  • Higher quartiles of cumulative systolic BP and pulse pressure linked to faster cognitive decline
  • No significant association found for diastolic BP
  • Each SD increment in cumulative SBP and PP associated with more rapid cognitive decline
  • Nonlinear dose-response relationships observed with cumulative SBP

Structured PICO

Does elevated cumulative blood pressure accelerate cognitive decline in middle-aged and older Chinese adults?

P
Population
7,877 middle-aged and older Chinese adults from the 2011 to 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), mean age 58.4 years, 46.8% men.
I
Intervention
Highest quartiles of cumulative systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP)
C
Comparator
Lowest quartiles of cumulative SBP, DBP, and PP
O
Outcome
Cognitive decline (measured by standardized z-scores of cognitive test scores)surrogate

Elevated cumulative systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure are independently associated with accelerated cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Given that the evidence of a longitudinal association between cumulative blood pressure (BP) levels and cognitive function is inadequate and inconclusive, we conducted this study to determine whether higher cumulative BP was independently associated with subsequent cognitive decline and to evaluate the potential dose‐response relationship between them. This cohort study used data from the 2011 to 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). All cognitive test scores were transformed into standardized z‐scores, with negative values indicating worse performance. We used linear mixed models and restricted cubic splines to assess the association of cumulative BP levels with cognitive function. A total of 7877 participants were included (mean SD age, 58.4 9.0 years; 46.8% men; median follow‐up duration, 6.9 IQR, 3.8–7.0 years). After controlling for multiple factors, compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartiles of cumulative systolic BP (SBP, β = −0.096 SD/year, 95% CI: −0.149 to −0.044) and pulse pressure (PP, β = −0.099 SD/year, 95% CI: −0.154 to −0.043) were independently associated with faster cognitive decline, whereas no significant association was observed for diastolic BP (DBP, β = −0.023 SD/year, 95% CI: −0.075 to 0.029). Each SD increment in cumulative SBP and PP, but not DBP, was also associated with accelerated cognitive decline. Additionally, nonlinear dose‐response relationships were observed between cumulative SBP and DBP levels and the rate of cognitive decline (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, elevated cumulative SBP and PP, but not DBP, were independently associated with accelerated cognitive decline among middle‐aged and older Chinese adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hua et al. (2026) studied this question. Elevated cumulative systolic blood pressure (β=-0.096 SD/year) and pulse pressure (β=-0.099 SD/year), but not diastolic blood pressure, were associated with accelerated cognitive decline.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f645a333a821460e8d4https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70226
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper