Systematic review reveals deep learning improves MDD detection, indicating need for real-world applicability.
Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Deep learning methods have been widely used for MDD detection, with research suggesting that deep models outperform traditional machine learning techniques. However, detecting MDD remains challenging due to data heterogeneity, model complexities and the requirement for discriminative feature representations. Objective: This review outlines recent progress in deep learning methods for MDD detection from Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), with a focus on the model’s generalisability and features that most effectively represent the function/anatomy of the brain to contribute to biomarker identifications and interpretability. Further, the review assesses the applicability of current models to real-world challenges. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Studies involved clinically diagnosed MDD subjects, a control group, and deep learning methods for classification tasks. Results: The cerebellum, thalamus, amygdala, insula, and default mode network are the most frequently reported brain regions associated with depression. Although deep learning has shown impressive results, it has limitations in terms of reliance on labelled data, heterogeneity of data from various hospitals, and model interpretability. A majority of the studies lacked external validation and had a single-site dataset or regionally homogeneous datasets, and did not consider the temporal and dynamic nature of rs-fMRI data. Conclusion: Deep learning offers considerable potential in advancing MDD diagnosis and understanding its mechanisms. Multi-regional data collection, harmonisation techniques, and rigorous testing in real-world workflows should be the primary focus of future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: