Experimental in vivo study evaluates bone regeneration outcomes in canine mandibles using titanium mesh.
Purpose:The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the 16-week bone augmentation outcomes using a titanium mesh (TM), including an 8-week transmucosal healing period following TM removal, and 2) to investigate the impact of pseudo-periosteum formation on regenerative outcomes.Methods: Atrophic alveolar ridge defects were induced in 6 canine mandibles, and 5 periimplant defects were created in each hemi-mandible.Bone augmentation was attempted using the following randomly allocated modalities: 1) Control: no treatment; 2) TM group: blood clot covered by TM; 3) TM + bone substitute (BS) group: synthetic BS covered by TM; 4) TM + collagen membrane (CM) group: blood clot covered by TM and CM; and 5) TM + BS + CM group: BS covered by TM and CM.TMs were removed after 8 weeks, followed by abutment connection and an additional 8-week healing period.After sacrifice, histomorphometric analyses of hard and soft tissues were conducted.Results: Regardless of early TM exposure (5/30), all implants achieved successful osseointegration and demonstrated comparable bone regeneration outcomes.No significant differences in horizontal or vertical bone gain were observed among the groups, whereas superiority of the TM + BS group over the control group showed a higher augmented bone percentage (P=0.021).The thickness of the pseudo-periosteum was not associated with hard or soft tissue regeneration outcomes.Conclusions: TM removal after 8 weeks did not significantly affect the histologic outcomes of lateral bone augmentation performed with simultaneous implant placement.The presence of a pseudo-periosteum did not adversely influence either hard or soft tissue regenerative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: