Key result
Chronic Orai1 suppression elevates [Ca2+]i transients and spark amplitudes in female but not male mouse cardiomyocytes.
Why the study?
The physiological role of the Orai1 channel in adult ventricular cardiomyocytes remains incompletely defined.
Chronic functional suppression of Orai1 abrogates sex differences in cardiomyocyte excitation-contraction coupling, revealing a novel mechanistic contribution of Orai1 to sexual dimorphism in cardiac function.
May necessitate sex-specific considerations for Orai1 cardiac therapies; extends evidence of its role in sexual dimorphism.
The physiological role of the Orai1 channel, a store-operated Ca²⁺ channel (SOC) in adult ventricular cardiomyocytes, remains incompletely defined. Here, we report that Orai1 may contribute to excitation–contraction coupling (ECC) in a sex-specific manner. Using a mouse model with cardiac-specific expression of a dominant-negative human Orai1R91W mutant (C-dnO1), we found elevated [Ca²⁺]i transients and Ca²⁺ spark amplitudes in female C-dnO1 mice in comparison with littermate wild-type (WT) controls, but not in male mice. The Orai1 protein expression, cellular distribution, and store-operated Ca²⁺ entry (SOCE) activity were similar in WT males and females and equally diminished in both sexes with C-dnO1 expression. These findings reveal that chronic functional suppression of Orai1 abrogates sex differences in cardiomyocyte ECC, uncovering a novel mechanistic contribution of Orai1 to sexual dimorphism in cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartoli et al. (2026) studied Orai1 channel function in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Cardiac-specific expression of a dominant-negative human Orai1R91W mutant (C-dnO1) vs. Littermate wild-type (WT) controls was evaluated on [Ca2+]i transients and Ca2+ spark amplitudes. Chronic functional suppression of Orai1 using a dominant-negative mutant elevated [Ca2+]i transients and Ca2+ spark amplitudes in female, but not male, adult mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: