Pilot trial demonstrates improved cognitive and emotional outcomes in breast cancer survivors after electroacupuncture treatment, suggesting its potential benefits.
Background We conducted a randomized, double-blinded pilot trial to compare the impact of two electroacupuncture (EA) regimens on co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms among breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods BCS who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sEA) acupoints. Primary endpoints were the within-group pre-post effect sizes (Glass’s Δ) in symptom severities, adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adjusted). Outcomes were assessed using neurocognitive tests (CANTAB®), PROs (FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF, EORTC QLQ-C30), plasma biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Responders were defined by reliable change index (for objective cognition) or MCID (for PROs). Results Thirty-five were recruited, with 30 (86%) completing all sessions. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2 (±12.2) years, and 86% reported co-occurring symptoms. Following treatment, the nEA group demonstrated significant improvements in attention (T3: Δ = 0.562, T4: Δ = 0.708, both p-adjusted < 0.05) and distress (T3: Δ = 0.764, T4: Δ = 0.711, both p-adjusted < 0.05). More responders were observed after nEA treatment for objective cognition (42.9% vs 12.5%) and distress (50% vs 37.5%). nEA-treated participants showed increased gray matter volume compared to sEA (p = 0.033), which positively correlated with better attention function (r = 0.69, p = 0.020). nEA-related improvements in memory and response speed were associated with reduced connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN–SFG, r=-0.93, p < 0.01) and increased connectivity in the Dorsal Attention Network (DAN–SMG, r = 0.86, p < 0.001), respectively. All adverse events were grade 2 or lower. Conclusions EA targeting neuropsychiatric-specific acupoints suggests improvements in cognition and distress symptoms in BCS, warranting validation in larger, multicenter trials. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05283577.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: