Field trials evaluate the impact of soil amendments on PTE bioavailability and maize growth in contaminated farmland, suggesting effective remediation strategies.
Potentially toxic element (PTE) co-contamination in farmland severely threatens global food safety. To identify effective remediation strategies, large-scale field trials were conducted in two karst regions of Southwest China highly co-contaminated with Cd, Pb, As, Cr, and Hg. The efficacy of seven commercial soil amendments (biochar (BC), fused calcium–magnesium phosphate (FCMP), humic acid (HA), potassium humate (KH), oyster shell powder (OS), composite passivator (PA), and quicklime (QL)) on soil physicochemical properties, PTE bioavailability, maize (Zea mays L.) yield, and plant tissue distribution was systematically evaluated. The results indicated that organic amendments, specifically BC, HA, and KH, consistently outperformed inorganic treatments. These organic materials significantly decreased the diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable fractions of cationic PTEs (e.g., Cd and Pb decreased by up to 39.5% under KH treatment) without inadvertently mobilizing As, unlike the alkaline inorganic amendments. This reduction in soil bioavailability closely correlated with improved plant performance, leading to maximum increases in root biomass (up to 130% with BC) and grain yield (up to 27.6% with HA). Furthermore, BC and humic substances effectively restricted PTE accumulation in grains (Cd and Pb reduced by up to 42.1%). Tissue distribution analysis revealed a consistently low root-to-stem translocation factor (TF < 0.2), indicating that roots acted as the primary sink for absorbed PTEs. This study indicates that commercial organic amendments support the use of a superior, broad-spectrum strategy for mitigating multi-PTE risks and ensuring safe agricultural utilization in severely co-contaminated areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: