Reveals spatiotemporal variation in understory litter coverage, indicating enhanced ecological recovery in red soil regions.
The forest understory litter fraction (FVCy) is a critical indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of “understory erosion” control in red soil regions; however, its high-precision, large-scale monitoring remains challenging due to canopy occlusion. This study proposes an FVCy inversion framework that integrates high-spatial-resolution Sentinel-2 imagery with multi-angular prior knowledge from MODIS BRDF products. First, a linear mapping model between multi-band reflectances at 0° and 45° view angles was constructed using 500 m MODIS MCD43A1 products (R2>0.8). This model was subsequently employed as a physical prior for anisotropic characterization and transferred to 10 m Sentinel-2 imagery to generate a long-term, dual-angle reflectance dataset. Subsequently, the four-scale geometric-optical model was utilized to decouple canopy and understory background signals, followed by quantitative FVCy inversion using a pixel-based dimidiate model. Validation results confirmed the reliability of the framework (R2=0.74, RMSE=0.1073). Spatiotemporal evolution analysis indicated a significant upward trend in FVCy across Changting County from 2016 to 2025, with over 90% of the area showing improvement. The proportion of high-coverage areas (FVCy>0.75) increased from 10% to 38%, exhibiting a “high in the center, low in the periphery” spatial pattern that aligns closely with core ecological restoration zones. Stability and persistence analyses further revealed that 61.18% of the study area reached moderate-to-high stability, and 70% of pixels exhibited a “positive persistence-improvement” trend, highlighting a pronounced inertia-driven enhancement in ecological recovery. This study provides a refined technical pathway for assessing soil and water conservation benefits in red soil regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: