Prospective study evaluates UACR as a biomarker for congestion in acute heart failure, suggesting clinical relevance.
Introduction: This study evaluated the trajectory of the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in patients hospitalized with acute Heart Failure (HF) from pre-admission (baseline), through hospital admission, discharge and two weeks post-discharge. We also assessed its association with congestion-related biomarkers, including NT-proBNP, CA 125 and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (N/L) ratio. Methods: Prospective, observational study including ninety-nine consecutive patients admitted with acute HF. Blood and urine analyses were performed at admission, at discharge and two weeks post-discharge. Patients were stratified according to UACR at admission and the trajectories of UACR and biomarkers were evaluated. The clinical, analytical and echocardiographic predictors of UACR were analysed. Results: Mean age was 70.812.2 years, 57% were men. At admission albuminuria was present in 65.7% of patients (45.5% microalbuminuria, 20.2% macroalbuminuria, respectively). A higher UACR at admission was associated with diabetes, lower eGFR, previous HF admission, higher clinical congestion score, mixed or right-sided congestive phenotype, higher NT-proBNP and CA 125 levels. The UACR worsened from baseline to admission and improved at discharge, reflecting the congestion dynamics. NT-proBNP, CA 125 and N/L ratio showed similar patterns. Independent predictors of higher UACR at admission were diabetes, reduced renal function, higher AST and lower vitamin D levels. In the mixed linear regression analysis, lower eGFR, and higher AST levels remained independently associated with UACR trajectory. Admission UACR correlated with congestion score and predicted higher in-hospital mortality and early HF readmissions (<30 days). Conclusions: Albuminuria is common in acute HF and exhibits a dynamic change in relation to congestion. These findings suggest a potential role as a biomarker for congestion monitoring. However, given the study limitations, the results should be considered exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galván-Ruiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: