A cross-sectional study assesses functional disability and coping in individuals with amputations, indicating significant associations.
Background: Traumatic amputations significantly affect physical function, coping, and self-esteem, highlighting the need for comprehensive rehabilitation and holistic nursing care. The study aims to assess the functional disability, coping strategies, and self-esteem of patients with upper or lower limb amputation. Methodology: Overall, 250 subjects were recruited from various departments and their services for this cross-sectional correlational study. Data was collected using standardized tools such as the WHODAS 2.0 – 36 Item questionnaire (α=0.98), Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations–SF21 (α=0.81), and Rosenberg’s Self-esteem scale (α=0.88) by using a researcher-administered method. Descriptive and Inferential statistics were used for analysis. Results: The findings revealed that 240 (96%) had a severe functional disability, 140 (56%) had a medium level of coping, and 200 (80%) had average self-esteem. Severe functional difficulty 180 (72%) was seen in participation. The majority had a medium level of avoidance coping 140 (56%). Correlation analysis showed a moderate negative association between functional disability and coping strategies (r = −0.514, p < 0.001), a weak negative association between functional disability and self-esteem (r = −0.140, p = 0.027), and a weak-to-moderate negative association between coping strategies and self-esteem (r = −0.280, p < 0.001). These findings indicate statistically significant associations among functional disability, coping strategies, and self-esteem. Conclusion: The study reveals a deeper connection between functional disability, coping strategies, and self-esteem among amputated patients, pressing the critical need for targeted nursing assessments and strategic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: