What question did this study set out to answer?

Provide an actionable, standardized guide for planning, conducting, organizing, and presenting systematic reviews, narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses across scientific disciplines.

August 8, 2018Annual Review of Psychology

How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Provide an actionable, standardized guide for planning, conducting, organizing, and presenting systematic reviews, narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses across scientific disciplines.
Outlined systematic protocols for exhaustive literature searches spanning published and unpublished empirical studies.
Established standard workflows for evaluating evidence quality, synthesizing quantitative data via meta-analyses, and integrating qualitative findings via meta-syntheses.
Identified recurrent methodological challenges and provided diagnostic strategies to link theoretical frameworks with empirical synthesis.
Formulated comprehensive best-practice standards for reporting evidence syntheses transparently and reproducibly.
Established that rigorous systematic reviews serve as a primary methodological defense against the replication crisis by systematically diagnosing inconsistencies across study results.
Delivered a cross-disciplinary conceptual blueprint optimized for psychological science but broadly applicable across academic domains.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Methodological guide demonstrates best practices for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, highlighting their role in evaluating research replicability.

Cite This Study

Siddaway et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1cc7c3585ec857138f780 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Methodological guide demonstrates best practices for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, highlighting their role in evaluating research replicability.

How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider