Retrospective cohort study shows tirofiban plus aspirin improves outcomes in acute branch atheromatous disease, suggesting potential as rescue therapy.
Background The optimal antiplatelet approach for branch atheromatous disease (BAD) remains uncertain. We evaluated whether early administration of tirofiban plus aspirin (T + A) improves outcomes compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and assessed its potential as rescue therapy for early neurological deterioration (END). Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with acute BAD treated between November 2022 and August 2025. Patients received either T + A or DAPT. Propensity score matching (caliper 0.02) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes were END within 7 days and excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 90 days; secondary outcomes included favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) and early neurological improvement. Results After matching, END occurred less frequently in the T + A group than in the DAPT group (10.1% vs. 55.1%; adjusted OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.03–0.20; p < 0.001). Excellent functional outcome at 90 days was more common with T + A (88.4% vs. 58.0%; adjusted OR 5.17; 95% CI 2.12–12.61; p < 0.001). T + A also improved early neurological recovery and favorable functional outcomes. Among patients who deteriorated on DAPT, exploratory rescue T + A was associated with improved recovery. No major bleeding increase was observed. These results are specific to this single-center cohort of Chinese patients with acute, mild-to-moderate BAD (NIHSS <15). Conclusion In this single-center cohort of Chinese patients with acute, mild-to-moderate BAD (NIHSS <15), tirofiban plus aspirin reduced END and improved 90-day functional outcomes. Exploratory evidence suggests it may also serve as a rescue therapy for patients deteriorating under DAPT. However, its efficacy and safety require validation in prospective, randomized studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: