PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Frontiers in Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Rewriting the crime divide: how executive functions and social cognition processes challenge violence classifications in the Colombian prison population

View Full Paper
MCMaria Teresa Cuervo CuestaMCMaria Antonia Chaguendo-QuinteroPontificia Universidad JaverianaNCNatalia Cadavid-RuizPontificia Universidad Javeriana

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare executive functions and social cognition among incarcerated males convicted of violent and nonviolent crimes.
  • Observational study design with a total of 117 male participants.
  • Groups included violent crimes (VC), nonviolent crimes (NVC), and a control group (CG).
  • Standardized tests assessed executive functions and social cognition. Methodologies included M-WCST, WAIS-IV subscales, Stroop, Mini-SEA, and Pain Empathy Task.
  • Both inmate groups showed worse performance in executive functions compared to the control group, notably in working memory.
  • The NVC group recognized negative emotions better, while the VC group identified sadness more accurately.
  • Both inmate groups displayed higher levels of affective empathy compared to the control group, with the VC group excelling in cognitive empathy.

Abstract

Background Executive functions (EF) and social cognition (SC) are fundamental to self-regulation and social behavior. Their impairment has been associated with criminal behavior, yet few studies integrate both areas, especially in highly violent contexts such as Colombia. Objective This observational study compared neuropsychological performance in EF (flexibility, working memory, and inhibition) and SC (emotional recognition and empathy) among males convicted of violent crimes (VC), nonviolent crimes (NVC), and a control group (CG). Methods A total of 117 men (39 per group), matched for age and educational level, participated in a case-control design. Standardized tests were administered: M-WCST, WAIS-IV subscales, Stroop, Mini-SEA, and Pain Empathy Task. Results Both groups of inmates performed worse on EF compared to the CG, with the difference being significant only in working memory. On SC, the NVC group showed better recognition of negative emotions, while the VC group was able to identify the emotion of sadness more accurately. Both groups showed greater affective empathy and empathic concern than the CG, and the VC group stood out for its cognitive empathy. Conclusion These findings show diverse profiles that don’t fit into the violent/nonviolent classification, highlighting the complexity of criminal behavior and the need to expand research with integrative approaches that allow for a better understanding of criminal behavior from the perspective of cognitive neuroscience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cuesta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc28a79560c99a0a1bd0https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1741171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper