Examines Islamic jurists' perspectives on commercial insurance contracts, indicating various legal interpretations.
This paper examines how Islamic jurists have approached the commercial insurance contract, focusing on its legal characterization and the main doctrinal arguments advanced for prohibition or permissibility. It discusses key issues such as uncertainty (gharar), usury (riba) and gambling-like elements (maisir), and reviews the reasoning used to reconcile modern insurance with classical contract categories. The article also highlights alternative models, including cooperative/takaful arrangements, as responses to these debates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed Jouhar (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: