PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Canadian Geotechnical Journal0 citations

DEM Evaluation of Load Transfer Mechanisms Between Closely Spaced Geosynthetic Layers

View Full Paper
YJYuanyuan JiaBeijing Sport UniversityAMAmr M. MorsyCalifornia State University SystemJZJorge G. Zornberg

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how load is transferred between closely spaced geosynthetic layers in reinforced soil structures.
  • Developed a numerical model using Discrete Element Method (DEM) to simulate a three-layer reinforcement system.
  • Replicated a controlled laboratory setup with an active layer under pullout loading and two passive layers.
  • Analyzed shear stress behavior in the reinforcement layers under varying normal stress levels.
  • Pullout behavior of the active layer mirrors that of a single reinforcement layer.
  • Tensile response is mainly influenced by interfacial shear resistance.
  • Interface shear stress increases linearly in passive layers corresponding to the active layer's increase.
  • Larger particle sizes enhance shear stress transfer due to improved mechanical interlocking.

Abstract

This study investigates the load transfer mechanisms between adjacent reinforcement layers in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) structures. Using the Discrete Element Method (DEM), a numerical model was developed to simulate a three-layer reinforcement system and explore the composite behavior resulting from soil–reinforcement interactions when reinforcement layers are closely spaced. The model replicates a controlled laboratory setup, in which a central active reinforcement layer is subjected to pullout loading while being confined by two passive layers above and below. TResults indicate that the pullout behavior of the active layer closely resembles that of a single reinforcement layer, with its tensile response primarily controlled by interfacial shear resistance. Analysis further shows that the increase in interface shear stress in the passive layers exhibits a linear relationship with the corresponding increase in the active layer, and this trend remains consistent under different normal stress levels ranging from 15 to 50 kPa. In addition, particle size was found to significantly affect stress redistribution: larger particles improved mechanical interlocking, thereby enhancing shear stress transfer to passive reinforcement layers. As a result, the vertical spacing at which composite interaction becomes significant was found to depend on the particle size distribution of the soil.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fca7a79560c99a0a2432https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0814
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trapdoor Model Tests on Multi-Layer Geosynthetic Reinforcement for Subsidence Mitigation2026
  2. 2Investigation of load transfer mechanisms in reinforced cohesive soil embankments in case of subsidence using DEM2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Influences of number of geosynthetic reinforcement layers on soil arching under cyclic loading2024
  4. 4Mechanism and Design Optimization of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Subgrades for Highway Widening Based on an Improved Soil-Reinforcement Interface Model2026
  5. 5Effect of particle gradation on pullout response of geogrids: A micromechanical perspective2025