Trapdoor tests assess load-transfer in multi-layer geosynthetic reinforcement, indicating optimal anchorage length and spacing.
Localized subsidence remediation in narrow working areas is often constrained by limited reinforcement width and anchorage length. This study investigates the load-transfer and deformation behaviour of multi-layer geosynthetic reinforcement under such conditions through 1:5 scaled trapdoor tests and PFC2D simulations. A three-layer geotextile system was tested by varying anchorage length and interlayer spacing, and a soil arching load-transfer ratio, η, was introduced to quantify the contribution of soil arching. The results show that increasing anchorage length from 0.5B to B increased η from 74.82% to 86.51%, whereas a further increase to 1.5B raised η only slightly to 89.02%. Over the same range, surface settlement and the midspan deflection of the lowest reinforcement decreased by 26.84% and 16.46% from 0.5B to B, but only by a further 1.55% and 2.53% from B to 1.5B. At L = B, η reached 61.89%, 86.51%, and 78.75% for s = 0.3B, 0.2B, and 0.1B, respectively, indicating that the intermediate spacing was most favourable for soil arching load-transfer. The DEM results further showed diminishing returns with increasing layer number, with the three-layer configuration achieving about 95% of the five-layer performance. Overall, high and stable load-transfer performance was obtained at L/B = 1.0–1.25 and s/B = 0.15–0.2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: