This research reveals intrinsic motility differences among termite castes, indicating varied responses to crowding.
Lévy-like movement patterns, characterized by heavy-tailed step-length distributions, are often considered a highly efficient strategy for solitary searching. While recent studies have established that isolated termite workers possess intrinsic Lévy-like motility templates, how these scale-free patterns differ across functionally distinct castes—and how they adapt to the extreme physical crowding typical of natural subterranean galleries remains unresolved. Here, using high-resolution tracking of the subterranean termite Reticulitermes labralis across group sizes from solitary individuals (N = 1) to high jammed crowds (N = 1,000), we reveal a fundamental motility asymmetry between castes. Building upon established worker baseline, we demonstrate that these intrinsic behavioral templates are highly heterogeneous: although solitary individuals of both castes intrinsically exhibit Lévy-like motion, workers maintain a significantly stronger super-diffusive baseline compared to queens, reflecting an innate predisposition for extensive exploration. As social density increases, physical blocking (steric repulsion) universally truncates trajectories toward multi-phasic Brownian dynamics. However, this truncation is functionally divergent: workers retain greater mobility resilience, preserving exploration efficiency even under crowding, whereas queens rapidly succumb to physical entrapment. Integrating empirical data with an Agent-Based Model, we show that this transition emerges naturally from pervasive physical constraints. Our findings suggest that the interplay between caste-specific intrinsic templates and uniform physical blocking spontaneously organizes the colony’s division of labor: workers are tuned for efficient exploration, while queens are physically constrained to become static interaction hubs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: