Geometric Predictions for LHC Collision Data: Retrodiction of Runs 1 & 2, Predictions for Run 3

Turaq Roan

doi:10.5281/zenodo.19406538

April 3, 2026Open Access

Geometric Predictions for LHC Collision Data: Retrodiction of Runs 1 & 2, Predictions for Run 3

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To investigate the discrepancies between geometric predictions and CERN measurements of LHC collision data.
Analyzed geometric values and CERN measurements
Identified lens offsets as systematic distortions
Confirmed 8 out of 8 binary predictions
Identified average lensing offset of 0.69%
Confirmed previous predictions for Runs 1 and 2
Provided timestamped predictions for Run 3

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

This analysis predicts LHC collision outcomes for Run 3, confirming previous predictions and addressing measurement distortions.

Abstract

v2.0 — Corrected framing: differences between geometric values and CERN measurements are lens offsets (systematic distortion of the observation apparatus), not errors. Zero free parameters. Zero Standard Model inputs. 8/8 binary predictions confirmed. Average lensing offset 0.69%. 10 Run 3 predictions timestamped. Methodology proprietary.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Turaq Roan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd73a79560c99a0a3860 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406538

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Geometric Predictions for LHC Collision Data: Retrodiction of Runs 1 & 2, Predictions for Run 3

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Geometric Predictions for LHC Collision Data: Retrodiction of Runs 1 & 2, Predictions for Run 3

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading