Analysis of MRI data shows greater grey matter loss in females with Alzheimer's, indicating distinct vulnerabilities across sex.
Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive and functional deterioration, with mild cognitive impairment as an intermediate stage. Using high-resolution structural MRI from 332 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants, we examined sex-specific grey matter volume (GMV) differences across healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Whole-brain parcellation into 82 regions revealed a significant group-by-sex interaction [F(164,488) = 1.42; P = 0.002; ηp² = 0.32], with 10 regions showing pronounced sex-dependent effects. GMV trajectories exhibited a clear sex-specific pattern. In healthy cohort, males and females displayed comparable GMVs. From healthy control to mild cognitive impairment, females remained relatively stable, whereas males showed a moderate decline. From mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease, however, females demonstrated steep and widespread GMV loss, contrasting with the slower, region-limited atrophy observed in males. Females also showed significantly greater reductions in key regions, including the left frontal pole during Alzheimer’s disease progression [F(1,243) = 10.68; P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.14] and the right caudal middle frontal cortex during mild cognitive impairment [F(1,243) = 10.62; P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.14]. Structural differences were mirrored in behavioural associations. Females showed more widespread associations between GMV and cognitive and functional performance: higher GMV was associated with better Mini-Mental State Examination scores, whereas lower GMV was associated with greater independence on the Functional Activities Questionnaire. These findings highlight a sex-dependent vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease, with females exhibiting both more extensive atrophy and more widespread atrophy–cognition coupling across disease stages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukherjee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: