Prospective interventional study evaluates fractional Er:YAG laser's efficacy in treating atrophic acne scars, highlighting safety and effectiveness.
Context: Acne is a leading cause of facial scarring and managing atrophic acne scars remains a clinical challenge. Fractional photothermolysis has become a widely accepted treatment approach. Among available lasers, Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) targets water-rich tissues with high precision and minimal thermal damage, making it suitable for superficial resurfacing. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional Er: YAG laser in patients with atrophic acne scars through a prospective interventional study. Settings and Design: This 12-month, prospective, interventional study was conducted at the dermatology department of a tertiary care hospital in North India, enrolling consecutive patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Materials and Methods: All participants received four sessions of fractional Er: YAG laser treatment at 4-week intervals. Improvement was assessed using Goodman and Baron qualitative and quantitative and patient assessment scores before each session and 8 weeks post final session. Side effects were recorded, and standardized photographs were taken during each visit. Statistical Analysis Used: With the help of SPSS software version 27, paired t -test was used to compare pre- and posttreatment scores; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 32 enrolled patients, 29 completed the study. Improvement by at least one qualitative grade was seen in 72.4% of patients; 3.4% improved by two grades. Statistically significant differences in the mean quantitative scores were seen from 8 weeks onward ( P < 0.001). The common side effects included transient erythema and grid marks. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and acne flares were infrequent. Conclusions: Fractional Er: YAG laser is a safe and effective treatment for atrophic acne scars, providing steady improvement with minimal adverse effects, particularly beneficial for Fitzpatrick skin types III–V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: