This case–control study evaluates biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, suggesting improved clinical management.
Background Traditional biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP) have limited diagnostic and prognostic utility in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This hospital-based case–control study evaluated non-classic immune biomarkers—neutrophil CD64 (nCD64), soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1), and monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) for CAP diagnosis and outcome prediction. Methods We enrolled 120 children (24–60 months): 60 with CAP and 60 age/sex-matched healthy controls. Primary endpoints were diagnostic accuracy (CAP vs. controls) and associations with disease severity (Clinical Respiratory Score), hospitalization duration, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Plasma sTREM-1 was measured by ELISA; nCD64 and mHLA-DR expression by flow cytometry. Results sTREM-1, nCD64, and nCD64/lymphocyte ratio were significantly higher, while mHLA-DR was lower in CAP cases versus controls (all p < 0.001). All biomarkers correlated significantly with CRP (r = 0.724, 0.760, 0.687, and -0.369, respectively; p < 0.001). Levels increased stepwise with disease severity and adverse outcomes. The nCD64/lymphocyte ratio showed superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.97, 95% CI 0.93–0.99; 90% sensitivity, 99% specificity), outperforming CRP (AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.94). Deceased children ( n = 4, 6.7%) exhibited the most pronounced biomarker alterations. Conclusion The nCD64/lymphocyte ratio is a highly accurate diagnostic biomarker for pediatric CAP. nCD64, sTREM-1, and mHLA-DR demonstrate significant prognostic value, effectively stratifying severity and predicting outcomes. Integrating these biomarkers may enhance clinical management and antibiotic stewardship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohany et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: