Uncovers the role of BRD9 in regulating GBAF activity in synovial sarcoma, suggesting implications for treatment.
Synovial sarcoma (SyS) incorporates the SS18::SSX fusion oncoprotein into GLTSCR1-containing BRG1/BRM and associated factors (GBAF) complexes, and demonstrated a dependency on GBAF subunit, BRD9. However, SyS clinical trials with multiple BRD9 degraders failed to achieve clinically impactful remissions. Here, we provide a mechanistic framework to explain these results. BRD9 depletion serves to blunt proliferation in SySs harboring minimal genomic alterations, rare in trial participants. In cultured cells, xenografts, and recombinant purified complexes, BRD9 loss does not impact GBAF assembly. Although BRD9 degradation in SyS reduces GBAF enrichment at target loci, BRD9-less complexes maintain or increase chromatin accessibility and associated gene transcription. Biochemical assays with purified recombinant GBAF demonstrate markedly increased nucleosome sliding in the absence of BRD9. Thus, BRD9 restrains GBAF activity, with BRD9 degradation increasing enzymatic remodeling and target gene expression by fusion oncoprotein-distributed GBAFs in SyS. This subtle epigenetic disturbance creates a low hurdle for SyS to surpass. Citation Format: Jinxiu Li, Mary Nelson, Li Li, Xiaobo Xia, Christine Stephan, Katarzyna Modzelewska, Gary Yu, Iain Mulford, Honnappa Srinivas, Xinyi Ge, Sarah McCollum, Ewin R Jones, Yixuan Guo, Xi Chen, Thomas Zoller, Gregory Hollingworth, Ensar Halilovic, Tinya J. Abrams, Edmund Harrington, Sofia Gkountela, Giorgio Galli, Hans Voshol, Nathalie Carte, Jason Thomas, Xiaoyang Zhang, David Lum, Martin Hirst, Jeffery Yap, William Forrester, Bradley R. Cairns, Kevin Bruce Jones. BRD9 functions as a negative regulator of GBAF in synovial sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3499.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: