A systematic review compares surgical resection and non-surgical treatments on survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis, suggesting benefits of surgical...
Background: The role of surgical resection (SR) as a primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains uncertain. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases from January 2000 to April 2024 identified studies comparing SR with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), combined TACE and radiation therapy (TACE-RT), or sorafenib. Meta-analyses were conducted for comparison groups with at least three eligible studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) were extracted or reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Twelve retrospective cohort studies involving 4,498 patients were included. SR demonstrated superior long-term OS compared with TACE in Vp1-2 (5-year OS: HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79) and Vp3 (5-year OS: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.75), with comparable outcomes in Vp4. SR and TACE-RT showed similar 1- and 3-year OS, although SR demonstrated a clear 5-year OS advantage in Vp1-3 PVTT (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74). Compared with sorafenib, SR provided superior OS in Vp1-2 (3-year OS: HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.38) and comparable OS in Vp3. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings, and no substantial publication bias was detected. Conclusion: Based on current evidence, SR is not inferior to non-surgical treatments including TACE, TACE-RT, and sorafenib in patients with HCC and PVTT and provides meaningful long-term survival benefits, particularly in those with segmental PVTT (Vp1-Vp2). Further comparative studies incorporating immunotherapy are needed in future research. Citation Format: Seok-Hwan Kim, Sang Hoon Kim. Surgical resection versus non-surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 4811.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: