Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Development of a TM-loaded double Pickering emulsion improves drug delivery in glaucoma, suggesting better ocular retention and bioavailability.
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, associated with high intraocular pressure. Topical beta-adrenergic antagonists, such as timolol maleate (TM), are first-line therapies but often have limited effectiveness due to rapid precorneal clearance and low ocular absorption. To address these limitations, a TM-loaded water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double Pickering emulsion (TM-loaded DPE) was developed to enhance corneal retention, sustain drug release, and enhance ocular bioavailability. The TM-loaded DPE consisted of a primary W/O emulsion prepared from TM solution and mineral oil, stabilized by soy lecithin, combined with an external aqueous phase containing chitosan-Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (chitosan-HPMC) particles as Pickering stabilizers, to form a W/O/W emulsion. Chitosan-HPMC particles had a size of 1.02 ± 0.16 μm, a zeta potential of 36.20 ± 2.41 mV, and a contact angle of 78.47 ± 1.80°, making them suitable Pickering stabilizers. The TM encapsulation efficiency in the TM-loaded DPE was 96%, indicating the high loading capacity of the developed system. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed a mononuclear droplet morphology, and the system exhibited excellent macroscopic physical stability under refrigerated conditions (4 °C, 12 months), as corroborated by the creaming index test, despite slight signs of coalescence observed in microscopic analysis. Rheological testing confirmed a non-Newtonian and shear-thinning behavior. The formulation achieved approximately 84% TM release over 48 hours, indicating sustained release. The Hen egg test chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assay indicated no irritation potential, confirming its safety. Overall, these results highlight TM-loaded DPE as a promising drug delivery system for glaucoma treatment, offering improved drug retention and enhanced ocular bioavailability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teixeira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: