PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research2 citations

Survival and Risk Factors of Dental Implants in the Anterior Mandible: A Cohort Study

View Full Paper
DHDorom HaimLELana Eskander‐HashoulHBHadar Better

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the survival rates and risk factors associated with dental implants in the anterior mandible.
  • Included patients treated at Maccabi‐Dent clinics from 2013 to 2024.
  • Conducted analyses using chi-square tests and Kaplan–Meier/log-rank along with Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Assessed early and late implant failures based on demographic and clinical data.
  • Total of 11,600 implants resulted in a 97.9% overall survival rate over 4.51 years.
  • Short implants (<10 mm) were linked to reduced survival rates.
  • Penicillin allergy and short implants increased failure risk, while age ≥ 60 and long implants were protective.
  • Early failures were associated with penicillin allergy, short implants, and male sex.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate survival and risk indicators of dental implants placed in the anterior mandible in a large cohort. Materials and Methods Patients treated at Maccabi‐Dent clinics between 2013 and 2024 who received implants in the anterior mandible (teeth 33–43) were included. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic records. Crude survival rates were compared using chi‐square tests; time‐to‐event outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier/log‐rank and Cox proportional hazards models clustered by subjects, including separate analyses of early ( 1 year) failures. Results A total of 11 600 implants were placed in 5730 subjects, with an overall survival rate of 97.9% (246 failures) for 4.51 ± 2.8 years. Short implant length ( 11.5 mm) were protective. Early failures were predicted by penicillin allergy, short implants, and male sex, while late failures were primarily influenced by implant geometry and age. Conclusions Anterior mandibular implants demonstrated excellent long‐term survival. Short implants were consistently associated with higher risk across early, late, and overall failures. Penicillin allergy increased early and overall failure risk, while older age and longer implants were protective. These findings highlight the influence of both patient factors and implant geometry on implant longevity in the anterior mandible; however, these associations should be interpreted with caution, as data on potentially important confounders, including bone grafting materials, surgical protocol, and prosthetic/loading‐related factors, were not consistently available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e3e9c07852e0af97c42https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of Survival Rates of Dental Implants and the Risk Factors: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Age‐related local versus systemic early phase wound healing dynamics following free gingival graft harvest2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri‐implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review2023 · 82 citations
  4. 4Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis2019 · 552 citations
  5. 5The Etiology and Management of Dental Implant Failure: A Review2022 · 91 citations