Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This approach converts fermionic and quantum models into QUBOs, facilitating understanding of quantum behaviors in computing systems.
We present an end-to-end, symmetry-aware pipeline that converts interacting fermionic and quantum-spin models into annealer-ready QUBOs while preserving low-energy physics. The workflow combines Bravyi–Kitaev encoding, exact Z₂ symmetry tapering, Xia–Bian–Kais (XBK) diagonalization to a Z-only form, and k \!→ \!2 local quadratization, with ground energies recovered via a Dinkelbach fixed-point over the resulting Ising objective. We validate the approach across a complexity ladder: (i) a frustrated 2D Ising model run on a D-Wave Advantage QPU reproduces the known ferromagnet–stripe transition; (ii) finite-temperature checks on 1D Ising recover standard finite-size trends; (iii) a genuinely quantum spin target (XXZ) matches exact diagonalization (ED) on small chains; and (iv) interacting fermions (t–V) in 1D (rings $$L=2\!-\!8$$) show ED-level energies and the expected kink near V/t≈ 2, with a 2D 2× 2 cluster tracking ED slopes up to a uniform offset. A replication-factor study quantifies the accuracy–overhead trade-off, with O-of-magnitude error reduction by and diminishing returns beyond r\!≈ \!Nq Except for the classical Ising benchmark and Molecular benchmarks, experiments use D-Wave’s public DIMOD and Neal simulators; a molecular benzene case in the appendix illustrates portability beyond lattices. The results establish a practical pathway for mapping quantum matter to current annealers, with clear knobs for fidelity, resources, and embedding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagpal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: