Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Registry-based study compares transplant outcomes for diabetic and non-diabetic patients, indicating implications for patient survival.
Introduction: This study aims to estimate the impact of type-II diabetes (DM-II) on kidney transplant outcomes and graft utility. Methods: A nation-wide, registry-based study that compares outcomes for all primary kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2022 in the Netherlands in DM-II patients (761 deceased and 364 living donor procedures) with non-diabetic controls. Results: Short-term (≤90 days) transplant outcomes for living donor procedures were similar for DM-II and non-diabetic controls. Deceased donor transplantions in DM-II patients were associated with an increased incidence of delayed graft function (p<0.0002), and a doubling of 90-days mortality (HR: 2.19 (95% CI: 1.49-3.23), p< 0.0001). Evaluation of long-term graft survival, with death as competing risk indicated an equal (sub-distribution Hazard Rate (sHR) 0.95 [0.74-1.23]); respectively compromised (sHR 1.91 [1.37-2.65]; p<0.001) survival for grafts from deceased or living donors. DM-II profoundly impacted recipient survival (HR for death 1.63 [1.45-1.82] and 1.81 [1.51-2.17]; p<0.001 for recipients of a deceased or living donor graft respectively (non-diabetic recipients reference):, with cardiovascular and infection as dominant causes of death. The compromised recipient survival profoundly impacted the utility of kidney transplantations (p<0.001). Conclusions: Despite excellent graft survival, the efficacy of kidney transplantations in DM-II patients is compromised by reduced recipient survival. Cause of death distribution suggests a role for immunosuppressive regimens in the excess mortality observed. A shift in focus from optimized transplant- to optimized patient survival is warranted for DM-II patients. Moreover, the conflict between increasing incidences of DM-II, a lower transplant utility, but persistent donor organ shortages calls for development of novel organ allocation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindeman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: