This pilot program trains gastroenterologists in advanced foregut management, highlighting the need for specialized education.
Background: Foregut disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal motility disorders, and obesity, represent a significant and growing clinical and economic burden. The evolution of nuanced diagnostics (eg, impedance planimetry) and advanced endoscopic therapeutics (eg, per-oral endoscopic myotomy [POEM], transoral incisionless fundoplication, endobariatrics) has created a training gap not addressed by standard gastroenterology or advanced endoscopy fellowships. Specialized expertise in managing these complex foregut disorders is a critical area of clinical need. Methods: The American Foregut Society (AFS) Education Committee developed a core curriculum for a 1-year advanced fellowship program focused on foregut disorders. This advanced program is designed for graduates of 3-year accredited gastroenterology fellowship training programs. We define a competency-based assessment framework based on domain-specific Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that integrate the six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies. Results: The Advanced GI Foregut Fellowship curriculum is comprised of three domains: esophageal motility; reflux, mucosal disease, and cancer; and, obesity and metabolic disorders. Fellows will be expected to achieve Level 4 (practice-ready) entrustment in at least two of these domains. Each domain features training to independent proficiency in patient evaluation, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic intervention. Conclusion: The AFS-sponsored Advanced GI Foregut Fellowship is proposed as a pilot program to formally train gastroenterologists to lead interdisciplinary foregut centers. We describe the curriculum, a novel GME assessment framework, and a strategy for implementation and evaluation. The pilot program will be used to determine appropriate training threshold volumes required to achieve competence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: