PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology2 citationsOpen Access

Patient‐Reported Outcomes After Treatment With OnabotulinumtoxinA for Platysma Prominence: Results From a Phase 2 Dose‐Ranging Study

View Full Paper
SHShannon HumphreySSSandhya ShimogaJKJoely Kaufman

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for treating platysma prominence based on patient-reported outcomes.
  • Randomized 1:1:1 design for onabotA doses and placebo.
  • Used validated patient-reported outcomes to assess multiple factors including treatment satisfaction and psychosocial impact.
  • Analyzed data from 164 subjects, focusing on improvement across various measures at multiple time points.
  • Both onabotA dose groups showed higher response rates in treatment satisfaction, jawline definition, and psychosocial impact compared to placebo.
  • Improvements in the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire scores were significant (p < 0.0001).
  • Response rates peaked at day 14 or 30, with continued improvement noted through day 120.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Repetitive contractions of the platysma muscle may result in vertical neck bands that blunt the jawline (i.e., platysma prominence PP ). We report patient‐reported outcomes ( PROs ) from a phase 2 study evaluating onabotulinumtoxinA ( onabotA ) for moderate or severe PP. Methods Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to onabotA dose 1 (26 U, 31 U, or 36 U), onabotA dose 2 (52 U, 62 U, or 72 U), or placebo. De novo, validated, fit‐for‐purpose PROs were used to assess treatment satisfaction, bother with vertical neck bands and jawline, jawline definition, and psychosocial impact. Results Subjects with PRO data ( N = 164; mean age, 50.0 years) were predominantly female (95.1%) and White (93.9%). Response rates for improvement in both onabotA dose groups were higher than placebo for treatment satisfaction, bother with vertical neck bands and jawline, as well as jawline definition (unadjusted p < 0.05 for all). Greater improvements in treatment satisfaction and psychosocial impact were observed in both dose groups versus placebo based on the mean total scores on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction and the mean change from baseline in ANLFQ: Impacts total score, respectively (unadjusted p < 0.0001 for all). Response rates generally peaked across all measures at day 14 or 30 for both dose groups, with a trend in improvement continuing through day 120. Conclusions Compared with placebo, both onabotA dose groups reported greater satisfaction with the effect of treatment, improvements in jawline definition and psychological impact, as well as reductions in bother due to vertical neck bands and jawline. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03915067

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Humphrey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e739c07852e0af97fabhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70821
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper