This framework standardizes diagnostic reasoning instruction, aiming to enhance learning and patient outcomes among clinicians.
Diagnostic reasoning (DR) is a core clinical skill, yet its teaching remains variable. We introduce the "5L" framework as a bedside teaching scaffold that gives educators and learners a shared, stepwise set of prompts for DR during individual encounters. By asking, "What's Lethal? What's Likely? What's Logical? What's Lurking? and What's Lingering?, we use a clinical case to systematically illustrate its use in guiding probability assessment, diagnostic fit, uncertainty reduction, and shared decision-making. This theoretically informed framework aims to standardize DR instruction and improve integration of risk, probability, illness scripts, problem representation, uncertainty, and patient values. Future work should evaluate its impact on learning and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brumfield et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: