Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a machine learning approach predicting risks in airport construction, indicating improved safety measures during operations.
Airport construction under non-stop operations presents unique safety challenges due to complex multi-factor interactions that traditional qualitative methods cannot adequately address. To address this, a study was conducted on 412 construction events (comprising 103 risk incidents and 309 routine events) at a major international hub airport between 2019 and 2024. First, a risk factor system encompassing six key categories, including personnel, environment, equipment, management, facilities, and operations, was developed, represented by 42 indicator variables. To address class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Subsequently, the XGBoost classifier was trained, achieving an accuracy of 92.7%, an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.875, and a recall rate of 85.7%. For model interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were utilized to quantify feature contributions and elucidate the risk transmission mechanism. Five core risk factors were identified: flight density, visibility, the timeliness of NOTAM release, peak hours, and the experience of construction personnel. Key thresholds were determined: flight density of 35 flights per hour, visibility of 3 km, and a 2-h delay in NOTAM release. SHAP analysis evaluated the synergy of operational pressure variables. These findings provide a foundation for integration into operational risk warning systems, supporting differentiated risk management and offering a data-driven approach to balancing efficiency with construction safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xian Yang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: