Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Framework analyzes portfolio risk and performance through Monte Carlo simulations, implying enhanced risk management practices.
This repository contains the preprint of the paper titled “Monte Carlo Portfolio Risk Analysis: A Framework for Stress Testing and Risk Measurement.” The work presents a Monte Carlo–based portfolio risk analysis framework that integrates geometric Brownian motion (GBM) scenario generation, empirical correlation modeling, regime-based crash stress scenarios, and short-horizon intraday forecasting. The system is designed to simulate a wide range of possible market outcomes and evaluate portfolio performance under both baseline and stressed conditions. The framework computes a comprehensive set of risk and performance metrics, including Value-at-Risk (VaR), Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), drawdown statistics, and distributional measures, alongside visual analytics such as return distributions and percentile-based outcome bands. It also incorporates backtesting procedures and comparative evaluation across historical, parametric, and simulation-based risk measures to assess model calibration and reliability. The study situates the framework within the broader literature on Monte Carlo risk modeling, stress testing, tail risk measurement, and high-frequency financial forecasting, and discusses the assumptions, limitations, and trade-offs involved in balancing model simplicity, computational efficiency, and realism. This version is shared for academic transparency, reproducibility, and early dissemination. A persistent DOI has been assigned via Zenodo to ensure long-term accessibility and citation. The author retains all rights to the work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuvraj Raghuwanshi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: