PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 1973New England Journal of Medicine549 citations

Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Cardiogenic Shock

View Full Paper
SSStephen ScheidtGWGary WilnerHMHiltrud S. Mueller

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on patients with cardiogenic shock.
  • Eighty-seven patients were treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation across 10 institutions under a common protocol.
  • Clinical and physiological responses were measured, including heart rate, arterial pressures, and cardiac output.
  • Metabolic studies assessed lactate production and extraction by the myocardium.
  • Heart rate decreased from 110 ± 24 to 103 ± 21 bpm, and systolic arterial pressure dropped from 76 ± 22 to 57 ± 17 mm Hg.
  • Cardiac output increased by 500 ml per minute, with improved lactate metrics in 18 of 19 patients.
  • Survival was 35 out of 87 patients, with 8 surviving beyond one year.

Abstract

Eighty-seven patients with cardiogenic shock were treated with the intra-aortic counterpulsating balloon in 10 institutions according to a common protocol. Clinical and physiologic responses were favorable in most patients. Heart rate fell from 110 ± 24 (mean ± S.D.) to 103 ± 21 beats per minute, systolic arterial pressure ("afterload") fell from 76 ± 22 to 57 ± 17 mm Hg, diastolic arterial pressure increased from 53 ± 12 to 83 ± 19 mm Hg, and mean arterial pressure did not change. Cardiac output increased 500 ml per minute, and a decrease in lactate production or increase in lactate extraction by the myocardium occurred in 18 of 19 patients with metabolic studies. Fifty-two patients died during balloon assistance, and 35 survived; 15 of the survivors left the hospital, and eight have lived for more than one year. Attempts to predict survival in advance, or from response to balloon counterpulsation, were generally unsuccessful, and precise indications for initiation and termination of balloon counterpulsation remain in doubt. (N Engl J Med 288:979–984, 1973)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scheidt et al. (1973) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d48a6595972252e7dc75a6https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197305102881901
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper