Sensitivity analysis quantifies yield variation in irrigated wheat systems, suggesting priority for canopy traits.
• Applied Sobol’ global sensitivity analysis to quantify APSIM-Wheat grain yield sensitivity using 26 years (2000–2025) of daily climate data under farmer-managed irrigation. • Identified canopy establishment and senescence traits (initial_tpla, fr_lf_sen_rate, node_sen_rate) as the dominant controls on yield variability under the tested non-limiting water and nutrient conditions, providing a clear calibration priority. • Found weak and non-significant climate modulation of annual sensitivity indices for the modeled wheat system, indicating broadly stable sensitivity rankings across years under irrigated, non-water-stressed conditions. • Revealed strong parameter interactions (first-order sensitivity indices accounting for <50% of total variance), demonstrating that one-at-a-time calibration fails to capture these synergistic effects—supporting the need for joint multi-parameter optimization. • Delivered practical guidance for efficient and transferable APSIM-Wheat cultivar parameterization in the North China Plain. Sensitivity analysis is essential for prioritizing crop model parameters and improving calibration efficiency. Sensitivities can shift with water and nitrogen availability, but whether they remain stable under interannual climate variability when irrigation buffers water stress is unknown. Here, we conducted a Sobol global sensitivity analysis of APSIM-Wheat grain yield using daily climate records for 2000–2025 at Xinxiang, China, a representative warm-temperate, semi-humid East Asian monsoon site in the North China Plain wheat belt, under regionally typical farmer-managed irrigation. Total sensitivity indices ( STi ) differed markedly among cultivar parameters: initial_tpla was most influential ( STi >0.8), followed by fr_lf_sen_rate and node_sen_rate ( STi =0.7–0.8). photop_sens and grains_per_gram_stem showed moderate sensitivity ( STi =0.6–0.7), whereas tt_end_of_juvenile and max_grain_size were lower ( STi =0.55–0.6); y_rue was least sensitive ( STi =0.45). Regressing annual STi against rainfall, maximum/minimum temperature, and solar radiation indicated weak and statistically non-significant relationships (| r |≤0.37, p ≥ 0.07). This stability occurred despite substantial interannual climate variability over the 25-year period, suggesting that parameter sensitivities were largely robust to interannual climate fluctuations, primarily because farmer irrigation consistently buffered water-stress variability. Moreover, Si / STi <0.5 for all parameters highlights that yield responses were dominated by parameter interactions rather than single-parameter effects. Overall, in warm-temperate, semi-humid monsoon wheat systems, yield calibration should prioritize canopy development and senescence parameters over climate-specific retuning, providing practical guidance for efficient and transferable APSIM-Wheat cultivar calibration under climate variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: