Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals HCT efficacy in mantle cell lymphoma patients, indicating key prognostic factors in treatment outcomes.
Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, yet prognosis remains inadequate for many. The choice between high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and allogeneic HCT remains a topic of debate in this patient population. This Japanese retrospective study (2017–2023) analyzed 155 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma receiving autologous (n = 105) or allogeneic HCT (n = 50). Autologous and allogeneic HCT showed comparable efficacy, with similar median OS (28 vs. 27 months). However, outcome predictors differed significantly. Autologous HCT: age > 60 years predicted worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.73) and allogeneic HCT: early progression surrogate based on diagnosis-to-HCT interval ≤ 24 months and relapsed or refractory status at HCT (HR = 4.10) and non-complete remission (HR = 3.53) correlated with poorer outcomes. Ibrutinib integration demonstrated critical benefits: post-autologous relapse patients receiving ibrutinib had superior 2-year OS (57% vs. 25%, P = 0.035), and no transplant-related mortality occurred in allogeneic HCT patients on ibrutinib (n = 10). This study confirms HCT use in the ibrutinib era, highlighting age, disease kinetics, and targeted therapy as key prognostic factors, and supports risk-adapted strategies combining HCT with novel agents like ibrutinib to optimize outcomes for high-risk mantle cell lymphoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamasaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: