Develops and validates a rubric for evaluating music teacher candidates, indicating its reliability.
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Music Teacher Candidate Assessment (MTCA), a rubric-based tool for evaluating student teachers in music classrooms. Factor analyses of scores issued by university supervisors (USs), cooperating teachers (CTs), and student teachers (STs) supported construct validity, explained 53.5% of the variance, and revealed two subscales: Pedagogy (I) and Professionalism (II). Concurrent validity resulted from a strong correlation ( r s = .83) between evaluators’ rubric averages and holistic ratings of performance. Inter-factor correlation ( r = .65) confirmed discriminant validity. All groups exceeded the α ≥ .80 threshold for acceptable internal consistency on both subscales with no increase by item deletion. Interrater reliability showed moderate exact agreement ( M = 0.54, SD = 0.05) among USs, CTs, and STs. However, exact + adjacent agreement exceeded .90 on all items and averaged .96 ( SD = 0.03) overall. The MTCA provides teacher educators with a reliable, discipline-specific assessment and reflection tool for use during the student teaching practicum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillip M. Hash (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: