PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2026Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine0 citationsOpen Access

Could non-humans have Traditional Ecological Knowledge? And if so, what should we do about it?

EFElodie FreymannFSFabien SchultzDRDaniel Redfearn

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore whether non-human species possess traditional ecological knowledge and the implications of recognizing it.
  • Review of ecological knowledge transmission in intelligent animal species
  • Discussion of zoopharmacognosy and its relevance to traditional ecological knowledge
  • Philosophical examination of ethical considerations in acknowledging non-human knowledge
  • Evidence suggests that species like elephants, cetaceans, and chimpanzees have their own forms of ecological knowledge
  • Initial findings indicate chimpanzees may use medicinal plants, indicating a form of traditional knowledge
  • Recognizing non-human traditional ecological knowledge could influence conservation strategies and policies

Abstract

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) has historically been understood as uniquely human. However, emerging evidence from elephants, cetaceans, chimpanzees and other intelligent species suggests that some animal communities maintain and transmit ecological knowledge across generations in ways comparable to human TEK. Here, we propose reframing these knowledge systems as Non-Human Traditional Ecological Knowledge (NHTEK), emphasizing the intergenerational transmission of ecological knowledge in non-human species. We extend this discussion to the emerging field of Zoopharmacognosy (the study of animal medication), where preliminary findings raise the possibility that certain species, in particular wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), may possess TEK related to medicinal resource-use. This possibility forces us to ask: are we ethically prepared for such a finding? Recognizing the existence of NHTEK challenges us to reconsider how we value non-human knowledge, how we protect it against commercial exploitation, and how conservation, intellectual property, and environmental governance might adapt in response. We argue that acknowledging the existence of non-human traditional ecological knowledge can shift anthropocentric perspectives and inform conservation policies aimed at protecting ecological cultures and relevant resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Freymann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49f8ab33cc4c35a227ee0https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-026-00877-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper