Large-scale study quantifies memorization of copyrighted content in language models, suggesting significant implications for copyright law.
We present a large-scale empirical study quantifying the memorization of copyrighted material in open-weight language models. Analyzing 81 models across 12 organizations, we introduce three novel forensic methods: (1) *Dataset Fingerprinting*, which distinguishes memorization of specific text versions from general content familiarity by comparing model perplexity on original versus sentence-reordered passages; (2) a *Memorization Scaling Law* quantifying how copyright retention increases with model size across three independent model families; and (3) *Evasion Detection via Min-K% Divergence*, demonstrating that instruction-tuned models retain identical copyright knowledge as their base counterparts despite safety training. Our experiments reveal that leading models reproduce copyrighted book passages with up to 100% verbatim accuracy, that larger models memorize 10–14% more copyrighted content than their smaller siblings, and that the fingerprint ratio for Harry Potter in Qwen2.5-7B reaches 4.49×, meaning the model recognizes the exact published text nearly five times better than a content-equivalent paraphrase. These findings carry significant implications for copyright law, AI regulation, and the transparency obligations of model developers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarik En nakhai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: