Investigation reveals laser shock peening enhances passivation and reduces corrosion in Ti–6Al–4V alloys, suggesting implications for material stability.
The effects of laser shock peening (LSP) on subtractively manufactured (SM) and additively manufactured (AM) Ti–6Al–4V alloys in pH 2 buffer solution were investigated. LSP increased the surface roughness from 0.25 ± 0.05 μm to 0.6 ± 0.1 μm, raised Vickers hardness by 12–16%, and introduced compressive residual stresses of 400–950 MPa. Microstructural analysis indicated that LSP promoted β-phase formation and grain refinement in SM alloys, while reducing the α′-phase fraction in AM alloys. Electrochemical testing revealed that all LSP-treated specimens exhibited active–passive transitions, unlike the stable passive response of unpeened samples. The corrosion rate (icorr) decreased from approximately 5 × 10−6 to 1 × 10−6 A·cm−2 after LSP. During 24 h potentiostatic polarization at 1.3 VSCE, the passive current density stabilized at 10−8–10−7 A·cm−2, with LSP AM specimens exhibiting values approximately twice those of their unpeened counterparts. Mott–Schottky analysis confirmed that the donor density (ND) in the SM alloy changed negligibly after LSP, indicating a stable passive alloy. In contrast, the ND for the AM alloy increased from 1 × 1019 to 3 × 1019 cm−3, suggesting an oxygen-vacancy-rich, less stable passive film. Overall, LSP reduces the corrosion rate primarily through the introduction of compressive residual stress but may impair the long-term passive-film stability of AM Ti–6Al–4V owing to defect generation. In contrast, the SM alloy maintains passive-film stability under identical treatment conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: