Why the study?
Immediate postoperative ICU admission improves survival in high-risk surgical patients, but reliable admission criteria are lacking, prompting evaluation of the surgical Apgar score across all surgeries.
Does the Surgical Apgar score predict immediate postoperative ICU admission in patients undergoing operative anesthesia?
Does the Surgical Apgar score predict immediate postoperative ICU admission in patients undergoing operative anesthesia?
A lower Surgical Apgar score is strongly associated with higher rates of immediate postoperative ICU admission, serving as a useful tool for clinical decision-making.
Immediate postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission can increase the survival rate in patients undergoing high-risk surgeries. Nevertheless, less than 15% of such patients are immediately admitted to the ICU due to no reliable criteria for admission. The surgical Apgar score (SAS) (0-10) can be used to predict postoperative complications, mortality rates, and ICU admission after high-risk intra-abdominal surgery. Our study was performed to determine the relationship between the SAS and postoperative ICU transfer after all surgeries. All patients undergoing operative anesthesia were retrospectively enrolled. Among 13,139 patients, 68.4% and < 9% of whom had a SASs of 7-10 and 0-4. Patients transferred to the ICU immediately after surgery was 7.8%. Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, emergency surgery, and the SAS were associated with ICU admission. The odds ratios for ICU admission in patients with SASs of 0-2, 3-4, and 5-6 were 5.2, 2.26, and 1.73, respectively (P < 0.001). In general, a higher ASA classification and a lower SAS were associated with higher rates of postoperative ICU admission after all surgeries. Although the SAS is calculated intraoperatively, it is a powerful tool for clinical decision-making regarding the immediate postoperative ICU transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: